01 · PRINCIPLE
Participation
Relevant knowledge, experience and perspectives should be considered when developing research and analysis.
TEDRIC · OUR STANDARDS
OUR STANDARDS
Effective, high quality, accurate and objective research and analysis standards.
01
Accuracy
02
Objectivity
2024+
Standards Framework
Our Research Standards
Effective, high quality and accurate.
TEDRIC aims to produce research and analysis that is useful, understandable, carefully prepared and relevant to the subject being examined.
Quality begins with reliable information, careful verification, serious research and a clear distinction between evidence, interpretation and opinion.
Objective by principle.
Research should not begin with a predetermined conclusion. Different perspectives should be considered fairly and conclusions should follow the available evidence and analysis.
Core Principles
02 · PRINCIPLE
Pluralism
Different political, academic, cultural and social perspectives should be examined without unnecessary bias.
03 · PRINCIPLE
Inclusion in the Process
Where appropriate, different voices and areas of expertise should have an opportunity to contribute to understanding.
04 · PRINCIPLE
Global Interest
Research should consider the wider international and human implications of important developments.
05 · PRINCIPLE
Rigor & Seriousness
Important subjects require disciplined research, careful reasoning and responsible conclusions.
06 · PRINCIPLE
Transparency
Research should be presented clearly, with appropriate transparency about evidence, methodology and limitations.
Cooperation on Legitimate Grounds
TEDRIC recognizes the value of cooperation between researchers, institutions, experts and knowledge organizations.
Cooperation should serve legitimate research, educational and knowledge objectives while preserving intellectual independence and analytical integrity.
Independence remains essential.
Cooperation must not compromise the accuracy, objectivity or independence of research and analysis. The purpose of cooperation is to strengthen knowledge, not to predetermine conclusions.
Verification & Accuracy
01 · VERIFY
Verification
Information should be checked against reliable sources whenever reasonably possible.
02 · ANALYSE
Critical Analysis
Information should be examined in context rather than presented as isolated facts.
03 · DISTINGUISH
Fact & Interpretation
Evidence, interpretation, assumptions and conclusions should be distinguished as clearly as possible.
04 · REVIEW
Continuous Review
Research should remain open to correction and improvement when new or better information becomes available.
05 · OBJECTIVITY
Avoiding Prejudice
Conclusions should not be driven by stereotypes, predetermined political positions or unsupported claims.
06 · TRUTH
Commitment to Truth
The central objective is to seek the most accurate and responsible understanding supported by available evidence.
TRANSPARENCY
Research should be open to examination.
Transparency strengthens trust in research. TEDRIC seeks to communicate its findings clearly and responsibly while making the basis of important conclusions understandable.
Meetings, events, research activities and knowledge-sharing processes should be conducted with appropriate openness and professional responsibility.
Quality Framework
Research with discipline.
TEDRIC's standards are intended to support a consistent research culture in which questions are examined carefully, sources are evaluated critically and conclusions are presented responsibly.
High-quality research is not defined only by the amount of information collected, but by the quality of the reasoning applied to it.
Accuracy before speed.
In a rapidly changing information environment, the pressure to publish quickly should not replace the responsibility to verify, contextualize and analyse information carefully.
TEDRIC PERSPECTIVE
Better research creates better understanding.
TEDRIC's standards are designed to protect the quality, independence and credibility of research. Honest research requires openness to different perspectives, commitment to evidence and the willingness to revise conclusions when facts change.